Proposal:0005 - Proposition on the usage of a Discord bot: Difference between revisions
From The OpenWiki Project
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
===Votes in favor of option C=== | ===Votes in favor of option C=== | ||
# A third party bot may present both social/political disagreement, as well as potential security risks to the server. I do not believe the utility presented by these bots are essential, and would rather implement whatever functionality personally through an in-house option. [[User:Ampera|Ampera]] ([[User talk:Ampera|talk]]) 12:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC) | # A third party bot may present both social/political disagreement, as well as potential security risks to the server. I do not believe the utility presented by these bots are essential, and would rather implement whatever functionality personally through an in-house option. [[User:Ampera|Ampera]] ([[User talk:Ampera|talk]]) 12:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC) | ||
# No point. [[User:PikaSamus|PikaSamus]] ([[User talk:PikaSamus|talk]]) 17:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:54, 6 February 2023
| Proposer: Ampera |
| Initial proposal date: Feb 5th, 2023 |
| Last update: Feb 5th, 2023 |
| Status: Proposed |
Preamble
This proposal is intended to be a small vote regarding the implementation of a Discord bot for use on the OpenWiki Project Discord server.
In the future, if any of these options shall become unsatisfactory, a subsequent proposal can always be created to change the decision.
S1. Options
A. Implement Carl bot
B. Implement Dyno bot
C. Implement no bot, instead opting to allow a custom made bot, whenever it may or may not happen
S2. New Proposal Type
- This proposal introduces a novel proposal type, a multi-choice proposal. Successful approval of any of the options shall count as an approval for adoption of this new proposal type.
- Multi-choice proposals must present lettered options, and reflect those options in the voting section
- Multi-choice proposals must specify if multiple choices may pass
- If multiple choices may not pass, then the first choice which gains a majority shall pass. In the event of a tie, then the proposal shall not pass until individuals rescind their votes to bring a single option into majority
- When a proposal passes, the status should be updated to reflect which options have passed.
Voting
This proposal requires a simple majority for a single option in order to pass.
Votes in favor of option A
Votes in favor of option B
Votes in favor of option C
- A third party bot may present both social/political disagreement, as well as potential security risks to the server. I do not believe the utility presented by these bots are essential, and would rather implement whatever functionality personally through an in-house option. Ampera (talk) 12:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- No point. PikaSamus (talk) 17:54, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
